Deng Xiaoping<\/a>\u2019s reforms. The US saw an opportunity to foster development and build bridges, directing funds toward agriculture, environmental protection, and public health. Annual allocations in the late 1990s and early 2000s typically ranged between $10 million and $20 million \u2013 modest sums compared to USAID\u2019s global budget but significant in their focus. Projects included rural development in provinces like Yunnan and Guizhou, where training in modern farming techniques and water management aimed to alleviate poverty. Another key effort was the US-China Partnership for Environmental Law, active until around 2014, which trained legal professionals to address pollution amid China\u2019s industrial boom. The Peace Corps, partly USAID-funded, also sent volunteers to teach English in Chinese universities until its exit in 2020, driven by rising US-China tensions. <\/p>\n\n\n\nThe rationale of these initiatives was clear: influence and stability. USAID sought to promote democratic ideals while ensuring China\u2019s growth aligned with US interests, especially during the tail end of the Cold War. But as China\u2019s economy surged \u2013 its GDP overtaking Japan\u2019s in 2010 to become the world\u2019s second-largest \u2013 its reliance on foreign aid waned. By 2011, USAID had largely wound down direct assistance, reflecting China\u2019s ability to fund its own development. Although USAID\u2019s work in China has ceased, its regional efforts, like disaster relief in Asia, have indirectly supported stability on China\u2019s doorstep.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/focus.cbbc.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/lp-membership1.png\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n